About Me

Name: Eric Jay
Location: Oceanside, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Flowchart: Dem's Health Plan

     This is precisely how I wanted to begin my day, trying to figure out what the flow chart for the Democrats' Health Care Reform shows. A whole lot of new bureaucracies! Recall what Congressman Mike Pence said the other night on FoxNews: the reform creates"...33 entitlement programs, creates or expands or extends, 53 additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs..." (at this point they had only read 317 pages of the more than 1000 page bill). In order to sort out the following chart you need a PHD. I keep hoping that voters would wake up to what it is that the Democrats are trying to create, and it ain't competition in health insurance.
The 2009 health-care chart.
Source: Jim Geraghty, National Review Online, "Off the Charts"
     When asked by reporters what it is that HealthCare reform is about, President Obama stresses what it is not, a path to a single payer system such as in Canada or Great Britain. How nice that Congressman Barney Frank has come clean in his goal:

…because we don’t have the votes for it. I wish we did. I think if we get a good public option it could lead to single payer, and that’s the best way to reach single payer. Saying you’ll do nothing until you get single payer is a sure way never to get it.

 

     Honesty is the best policy unless you are a politician. The Healthcare Reform is a means to an end, Single Payer HealthCare, it is disingenuous to say otherwise. I pray that while Congress goes out on its annual summer recess they get an earful from their constituents, as that is the only way now to defeat this monstrosity. Otherwise, our economy as well as our Healthcare system are doomed to further erosion.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can You Say: Plummet? Sure you can...

     I have not so much to say, other than to say it's about time reality caught up with perception...is the average voter seeing the truth rather than the MSM 'Cinderella President' put forth?  (Update, don't know why but the graphic portion is not loading very well, a large blank spot, so I deleted the graph, go to the link below.)
 
 
     Do you need more proof that voters are starting to see the forest for the trees? Via Drudge Report, Gallup: Obama Hits New Low. I know, I know, polls have no meaning...
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rep. Conyer's On Reading A Bill: Another Argument For Part Time Legilators

     I am appalled at the lack of duty our legislators feel toward their constituents. One reason that we send them off to Washington is that they are supposed to be knowledgeable and one reasonably assumes that at a minimum they would read what they vote upon. One example of our representatives not reading the bill put before them was the TARP 'stimulus bill.' Another bill with more than 1000 pages; we know how that has worked out. According to Congressman John Conyers that's what we have lawyers, besides we push it downhill; localities and states can then sort the mess out:
"Thousand-page bills, unread and indeed unwritten at the time of passage, are the death of representative government. They also provide a clue as to why, in a country this large, national government should be minimal and constrained. Even if you doubled or trebled the size of the legislature, the Conyers conundrum would still hold: No individual can read these bills and understand what he's voting on. That's why the bulk of these responsibilities should be left to states and subsidiary jurisdictions, which can legislate on such matters at readable length and in comprehensible language."  Rep. John Conyers before the National Press Club
    At the minimum we should demand that legislation be delayed until a) the legislator reads the bill and b) the legislation has been posted for a minimum period (based upon the length). This is disastrous let alone unacceptable. This is one way that a new bureaucracy is created and no one knows about it.
     Last night on Greta Van Susteren's show Congressman Mike Pence had the following to say:
What we've found so far, there -- it includes 33 entitlement programs, creates or expands or extends, 53 additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, bureaucracies the bill creates. It uses the word -- you'll like this from an attorney's perspective. It uses the word "shall" 1,683 times, representing new duties for bureaucrats and mandates. That's up from an increase of 306 mandates in the discussion draft. (Emphasis mine)
     The rush is not because there is some crisis as the White House is wont to tell us, daily (nice tactic Rahm, straight from Alinksy's rules, perhaps?) I might add. the rush is simply to get it passed before the public is all the wiser let alone the Senators and Representatives. This is unacceptable and one can see that voter frustration is beginning to boil over! Seen the Claire McCaskill Town Hall meets the 'Tea Party?'
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Foreign Policy Failure(s)

     Powerline has a post that basically says that the Obama Administration foreign policy is a failure, complete failure. The current trip to Israel by Middle East Envoy George Mitchell with hat in hand is merely the latest example. The Jerusalem Post had this to say:

Although no agreement was announced regarding the US demand for a settlement freeze, Israeli officials said the sides were "getting close" to "finding that common ground to enable progress."

      Our staunchest ally in years past is only "getting close," not even "close" to an agreement. The shift in policy by the current president has placed a strain on relations. What the Obama Administration has done is, basically, placed all of the Middle East players on the playing field as equals. His Egypt speech made that clear, his intent was to reach out to the Muslim world. Again, his efforts while noble are not effective. He has alienated Israel into a position that it can only be "getting close" to an agreement. In the end, they may simply decide to agree to disagree. Where does that leave us? Certainly, we are no closer to the Middle East peace that all presidents have sought.
     I believe that when the president made clear that he was going to sit down with any and all who were willing to meet. The impression then and perhaps now is that all leaders were/are the same and that he would meet with them without preconditions. Naturally, since he made the comments during the campaign he later back tracked and issued a more nuanced approach. Of course, he didn't mean without preconditions and certainly those talks wouldn't be at the presidential level.
     The first major foreign policy gaff was the Russian 'reset' debacle. The president needs some big win. He is suffering from a very bad week. Healthcare Reform is going nowhere fast and his comments regarding the police is still front and center of press coverage and the blogosphere. It seems that foreign policy isn't going to be a part of his bog win.
    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Afghanistan: Victory, Another Forbidden Word?

     It wasn't enough for the Obama Administration to ban the use of 'Global War on Terror,' tossed for the politically correct 'overseas contingency operation, now Obama is reluctant to use the term 'victory.' Oh, Heaven forbid if we were to expect victory in the continuing global war. The war in Afghanistan may have ended for the United States but both al-Qaeda and the Taliban have continued in their quest to retake the country; the Taliban want certain victory so they can take over the government, returning to the status quo ante, whereas AQ just wants to kill the American infidels.
     On ABC News last Thursday the president made the following comment:
"I'm always worried about using the word victory, because, you know, it invokes this notion of Emperor Hirohito coming down and signing a surrender to MacArthur." Investor's Business Daily, Opinion Page,  Friday, July 24, 2009
     This is from the Commander in Chief, the man ultimately responsible for protecting America, the man in full charge of the Armed Forces. If victory is not the goal, then what, pray tell, is? If his point is that one cannot negotiate peace with "nonstate actors" what he says is somewhat understandable. It is not the best phraseology to be using when that very 'nonstate actor' will forever use the quote as a recruiting tool.
     For a guy who is supposedly the smartest guy around, whose prose was to bring about peace (his speech in Egypt(?)aimed at Iran had no great effect either), he has almost as much a penchant for gaffs as his vice president. The imbroglio that his rash comments regarding the Cambridge police (oh, sorry, he "calibrated" to make it clear that he was referring to 'police' in general, not much better) caused took center stage all weekend and any other 'news' was bumped to the third page. This is a very important matter to understand the president's thinking, as:

"...we are at something of a crossroads in Afghanistan. The toil, tears, sweat — and especially blood — have increased of late.

As a result, public displeasure is on the rise in Britain, Canada and Germany, which with their tens of thousands of troops are taking part in the U.S.-led coalition — the kind of coalition, by the way, that liberal Democrats consider absolutely vital before fighting wars against terror states.

Our allies could eventually pull out. So at a time like this, the job of the president is to remind them, and the American people, that we are in a world war against a network of evildoers."
Investor's Business Daily, Opinion Page,  Friday, July 24, 2009
 
     This is another example of what some might call 'on the job training.' President Obama does not seem to have a grasp of how to run, manage, let alone, lead this country at a time in which we face an enemy that is intent not only on destroying the United States (and her allies). I shudder to think of the consequences of a major attack on the homeland. This is an enemy bent on eradicating freedom, liberty and, yes, the pursuit of happiness. Another goal of our enemy is to establish a new Caliphate. I wonder if the president has an inkling of the magnitude (not to mention its patience) to which our enemy will go to meet its goals.
     We are now seeing the ill effects of the on the job training. An article by Fred Barnes, "Know-Nothing-in-Chief
There's no evidence Obama has even a sketchy grasp of economics," is worth a read.
     Elections have consequences and, unfortunately, the election of 2008 is no exception. I pray that the ill effects are not irreversible.
     I leave you with the following quotes, the first is from IBD's article and the other is widely known:
 
"You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory. Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terrors, victory however long and hard the road may be — for without victory there is no survival."

~Winston Churchill, 1940 to the British people

 
We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
 
~George Orwell
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Heh!: The Ten Commandments According To Obama, Source News Max

     This landed in my email and I found it funny, I thought others would enjoy it as well. A little humor on a lazy Sunday afternoon is worthwhole.

PATRIOT UPDATE EXCLUSIVE:
The Ten Commandments According to Obama

© 2009 The Patriot Update. Feel free to circulate this article, but please give credit and link to The Patriot Update!
Click here for the Online Version.

After observing Obama on the campaign trail and during his first six months in office, we have concluded that our President lives and governs according to his own set of "Ten Commandments." They're certainly NOT the Ten Commandments you learned in Sunday School. In fact, many are the direct opposite! To prove that our conclusions are correct, you will find a link to source documentation for each commandment on the Patriot Update web site.


I. Thou shalt have no God in America, except for me. For we are no longer a Christian nation and, after all, I am the chosen One. (And like God, I do not have a birth certificate.) SOURCE

II. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, unless it is my face carved on Mt. Rushmore. SOURCE

III. Thou shalt not utter my middle name in vain (or in public). Only I can say Barack Hussein Obama. SOURCE

IV. Remember tax day, April 15th, to keep it holy. SOURCE

V. Honour thy father and thy mother until they are too old and sick to care for. They will cost our public-funded health-care system too much money. SOURCE

VI. Thou shalt not kill, unless you have an unwanted, unborn baby. For it would be an abomination to punish your daughter with a baby. SOURCE

VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery if you are conservative or a Republican. Liberals and Democrats are hereby forgiven for all of their infidelity and immorality, but the careers of conservatives will be forever destroyed. SOURCE

VIII. Thou shalt not steal, until you've been elected to public office. Only then is it acceptable to take money from hard-working, successful citizens and give it to those who do not work, illegal immigrants, or those who do not have the motivation to better their own lives. SOURCE

IX. Thou shalt not discriminate against thy neighbor unless they are conservative, Caucasian, or Christian. SOURCE

X. Thou shalt not covet because it is simply unnecessary. I will place such a heavy tax burden on those that have achieved the American Dream that, by the end of my term as President, nobody will have any wealth or material goods left for you to covet. SOURCE

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Update: President Obama's Non-Apology Apology

     What the heck? Why is it so easy for President Obama to travel to Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia and apologize for the actions of America. It is so easy for him to call the United States arrogant and morally incorrect in may of her actions in the world, especially as to how America reacted to 9/11.
     I am amazed that he can get up on the dias and get away with what he has to say. Today is an example of his utter arrogance and his total belief in that he is right, no matter what, and everyone else is wrong (unless you are a uber-liberal as he is).
     Is anyone else outraged that the president of the United States can get before the media and say the following:
"Because this has been ratcheting up and I helped contribute to ratcheting it up, I want to make clear that in my choice of words I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sgt. Crowley specifically and I could have calibrated those words differently."
     What? What in the world does that mean? That is so far from an apology that it would not satisy any toddlers' parent. This is the leader of the free world? This is a Harvard educated, law professor? 'Calibrated' my 'words differently?
     If my 6 year old, oh sorry she just turned 7 yesterday (see, I apologized), used anything remotely close to that I would make sure that I washed her mouth out with soap.  This is a role model for a young African-American?
     Come on Mr. President- be a man and do the honorable thing and apologize, show some contrition for words used in a rush to judgement. then we can all move on to the really important debates that we need to have.
   
     Could this be the part of the reason his approval has fallen to new lows, below 50%- Rasmussen Presidential Daily Tracking.
 
    Gee, could this kerfuffle be another reason we continue to see the erosion in President Obama's political karma? Now 53% of voters oppose Healthcare Reform as it now stands, again Rasmussen.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mr. President: Man Up, Admit You Were Wrong and We'll Move On

     The uproar this week over comments made by the president regarding the arresting office, as well as the Cambridge police, in the arrest of his friend and Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Specifically, the president accused the police of acting "stupidly."
     While making the accusation of stupidity there is an element of, of course, racial. Mr. Obama has made it clear that he felt that there was racial profiling and that it is a continuation of the historical racial bias at the Cambridge police.
      This is an attack not only upon the Sgt. Crowley and the Cambridge police department but every police officer on active duty. His comments not only have caused an uproar, but now there are a myriad of problems with the president's decision to make comments. He acted out of ignorance of the facts and out of his desire to defend his friend.
     President Obama has truly gotten himself into a sticky wicket. The facts are coming out and will be judged by not only the public but by lawyers, certainly. Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think the Sgt. and/or the Police Department will have any potential to take this to court; is not the president protected from "prosecution" while in office? Is defamation included in that protection?
     The public and electorate is tiring of the tactics that this president and his administration have taken. The honeymoon is now over. The MSM is being dragged into the fray kicking and screaming. They will reluctantly have to report this and it can't be favorable to the president.
     Now, we see that the is some sort of back tracking by the president. However, he has not gone far enough, and his administration spokespeople are making things worse.
     The president should man up, and apologize to the officer, Sgt. Crowley, and the Police Department in Cambridge and nationwide. He is saying that he regrets the furor his comments have created; not that he shouldn't have commented at all and regrets making a rash, rushed comment. That is cowardly and nowhere near honorable. It is not just that the comments were bad, but his judgement was skewed. He didn't have all the facts and should have refrained from commenting. He is not remorseful, he is dissembling, as he does. He is not forthcoming.
     I must say that this is the beginning of the end of President Obama's free ride. Finally...we can truly see the Alinsky liberal socialist community organizer.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Failure of Universal Healthcare: Example #18, Hawaii's Keiki Care

     Do you think someone in Congress will take notice of the failure of another Universal Healthcare failure. This failure comes from Hawaii, and the lesson learned? Gee, when the government steps in and offers a free or low cost example it crowds out private insurance. Normal, reasonable, average Joe's figure that if the cost of insurance A is $0.00 and B is $150.00, hmmm which one do you choose? Noone ever accused Congress of being rational and/or reasonable, eh?
     The following comes from Wizbang:

By Michael Laprarie on Health Care

Tonight's "Hannity" show on Fox News features an in-depth look at "Keiki Care", the attempt by the state government of Hawaii to implement a universal health insurance program.

From Griff Jenkins' blog at Fox:

[T]here are lessons in the land of pineapples that seem lost on its favorite son, Barack Obama.

Hawaii was the first state in the country to attempt universal health care. It was called "Keiki Care" (Keiki means Child in Native Hawaiian) and it was stopped seven short months after it began due to budgetary concerns. Republican Gov. Linda Lingle had signed it into law, but they soon found a whopping majority of those who wanted free health care already had been insured!

You don't hear the President talk about "Keiki Care" in his speeches. So our mission was simple: talk everyone in Hawaii and find out what happened in the Aloha State.

Here's more on last year's cancellation of Keiki Care:

Gov. Linda Lingle's administration cited budget shortfalls and other available health care options for eliminating funding for the program. A state official said families were dropping private coverage so their children would be eligible for the subsidized plan.

"People who were already able to afford health care began to stop paying for it so they could get it for free," said Dr. Kenny Fink, the administrator for Med-QUEST at the Department of Human Services. "I don't believe that was the intent of the program."

      Rationing of healthcare, long lines for care, bureaucrats making decisions instead of the patient and their doctor. Yep, that's what I want...
 
      The rush to get this done is what will ultimately be the failure to get it passed. Slow down and do it right. Start small and build upon success. Here's a place to start: electronic medical records which are accessible by doctor, clinics, hospitals, etc. If that will lower costs as President Obama promises, do it first. Then move on...
 
      Waterloo...Mr. President.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Heh! Today's Fun...Gotta Laugh Once In A While

      My day pretty much stank...car broke down yesterday, so it's in the shop and I am sitting around watching an NCIS marathon on USA...I can't get anymore angry at the political process that is the Congress and the president...egad, I can't stomach watching his 'I'm right, you're wrong' arrogance on his press conference- so I certainly won't be watching that. So I got a couple of editoons for ya:
 
Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez
 
Political Cartoons by Scott Stantis
 
Political Cartoons by Henry Payne
 
Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert
 
     And it is only 3pm...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Farce That Is The Presidential Press Conference

     The president is having another prime time press conference. It seems he is tiring of the steadily falling support for his pet (nay, dare I say his waterloo? Oh, that one touched a nerve, eh?) project: HealthCare Reform. Not only is there eroding support for the reform, it is commensurate with a steady decline in presidential approval rating. According to Rasmussen the June approval rating was at a high of 58% and now stands at 51% (it has fallen as low as 50%).
     So much for bi-partisanship and the bringing together of a new politics, huh? There has been very little bi-partisanship as with the rush to cram-down the stimulus plan, the president and Reid/Pelosi Democratic Leadership are rushing to get HealthCare Reform done. Thank goodness there are a few Blue Dog Democrats who are holding out. I pray that they are holding out on principle and not for the gain of some political favors and/or gain.
     Which brings us back to the presidential presser. The president is going to come out swinging. It seems that Senator Demint touched a nerve when he called the HealthCare Reform President Obama's Waterloo. It certainly has proven to be an Albatross, as the longer HealthCare Reform is rushed through the lower approval ratings are going to go. There is only so much that American people are going to take when it comes to the game of politics. They tire when they are deceived or merely "mis-led."
     There needs to be a slowing down. There needs to be a debate. I thought that was one thing that Obama/Biden, and the Democrats promised in winning. New politics. Openness. Transparency. We got none with TARP and we are getting more of the same now. As details roll out about the proposals on the table (as far as anyone can really tell) the less the American people like the reform. I have always thought that the American people would not tolerate a full nationalized healthcare system.
     Hearing that there will be a committee of bureaucrats and politicians deciding which procedures will be necessary, cost-effective is too much to bear. That smacks of socialism. There will be a severe backlash if the reform passes in the form it is; just asking legislators to read the darn thing is problematic enough.
     Let's have the debate. Let's get true reform not just a political notch on the belt...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

United States Budget Deficit Exceeds $1.0 Trillion

     The budget deficit for the United States has exceeded the fateful $1.0 Trillion for the first time according to the Treasury Department. Economists and the Treasury had predicted the shortfall to be $94.3 billion but it seems that tax receipts have fallen in the first nine months of the year.
chart_deficit_june.jpg
     We are headed toward unprecedented spending increases with socialized programs. Whether it be the massive new entitlement of Health Insurance (not Healthcare reform, state the reality) outside of MediCare or the planned economy through bailouts.
     When President Obama forces the hand of legislators to enact the 'HealthCare' reform to nationalize our health care system our deficits will increase beyond anything seen in peacetime. When the economy crashes again due to higher taxes with the new 'Cap and Trade' along with taxing small business and the wealthy to fund nationalized healthcare we will be headed for a crash of unknown proportion(s).
     One need only look at California to see what happens when spending is out of control with budget deficits looming as far as the eye can see. Only bankruptcy, a start over, or perhaps as the Obama Administration likes to say 'hit the reset button.'  Heaven forbid if the Democratic leadership would read their proposed legislation (as a start) or truly look at the nationalized healthcare fiascoes in Canada, Great Britain and others. But no!
     Alas, they (Democrats and bureaucrats) know best. When we have a debate as to how to best reform our healthcare access, using Healthcare Saving Accounts, portable insurance and other reforms that include market reforms and patient involvement will we have some measure of success. The CBO continues to say the reforms proposed will do nothing to lower costs and merely grow deficit spending and higher taxation.
     The number of uninsured that is batted about is such a farce. A great many of those uninsured's are young, many can afford to purchase insurance and chose not to, and end up with insurance in a few years after going without coverage. The number when whittled down shows that the true number of uninsured is closer to 11-12 million. Why are we discussing forcing every American to buy insurance, every employer to provide insurance or faces stiff tax penalties? Why are we talking about the Federal Government covering every American?
     When the liberal notion of Helathcare Reform is realized what's next? Cable in every home? HD TV's in every home? Cell phones, web access? Perhaps the Federal Government should buy me a house? Or shall our Goverment Motors (GM) provide a hybrid car in every garage?
     When the liberal socialist agenda is enacted through the 'Change' we can believe in will Americans wake up and smell the coffee? When we become the United Socialist States of America will we truly have a discussion as to what our founding fathers' republican government experiment, created in 1776, and profoundly standing as the one true 'Shining City on a Hill,' means when it speaks about its governance? Or will it be too late?
     It seems that we have lost sight of the notion that:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
     We seem to forget that our government was and is set up to give everyone not only equal rights, but equal opportunity to "Happiness," not guaranteeing of equal success. Hey, want to have a discussion about the wealthiest nation on God's green earth providing some measure of safety, security and, okay, health. Let us not look to the government to, as our president is advocating, provide:
"... I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
      ~then candidate for President, Barack Obama to Joe the Plumber
     We were given ample warning as to how President Obama was likely to govern. While I wish the president and his family all the very best, wishing no harm in any way, I vehemently disagree with his governance, his socialistic tendencies as it pertains to governing. We need to find Republicans who are willing to go to the mat against Obama/Pelosi/Reid, sticking to the principles of Republican governance.
     It is time to grow backbones and not just be a loyal opposition but a true opposition to stop the creep of the federal government into our daily lives. I must say I can never see some bureaucrat in D.C. telling me and my doctors what procedure is necessary. I cannot believe that as the reform now stands it is likely that our government will pay for abortions. Sadly, our legislators are not even willing to read their own legislation as occurred with the abominable TARP bailouts.
 
We are truly headed in very much the wrong way...
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy Birthday America; THE Symbol of Freedom, Liberty, Justice...

I would like to wish America a hearty Happy Birthday! 
May her flag ever wave, riding the winds of freedom, liberty, justice and the opportunity of all free peoples to pursue happiness. As Lady Liberty watched over all who arrived during the days of immigration may the flag continue to be not merely a symbol, but THE symbol all oppressed people across the globe look to a better life.
 
As I pray every day, I again ask that the Lord put His Holy Spirit as a ring of protection around those who stand between the free people of America, her allies and her enemies. Protect us from those who would not only want to harm us, but who desire our absolute destruction and the destruction of our closest allies; amongst our staunchest ally Israel feels the winds of war and destruction. May the Lord protect and bless the men and women of our Armed Forces, and grant great wisdom upon our leaders. Their sacrifice shall not be in vein; today 50 million are freer in Iraq and Afghanistan. While the manner in which we found ourselves thrust into those two countries there can be no doubt that both countries are better off under the banner of freedom than they were under the boots of tyranny of Sadaam Hussein and the Taliban.
 
We celebrate today, BBQ, drink, eat and enjoy our families in peace today because, as George Orwell so aptly said:
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. " ~George Orwell
 
Again, May God Bless America!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My BS Meter Working Overtime: CA Budget Crisis Cut Off By Cow Tail Debate

The phrase goes something along the lines that: 'whilst Rome burns, Nero fiddles...'  In the midst of the worst fiscal crisis ever, the legislators of California found time to debate on one of the greatest calamties to face the state since the California bound Donner Party partook of human flesh:
"Right now, in the midst of a budget crisis, they are debating about cow tails, and I think that this is inexcusable," Schwarzenegger said. "I mean, how do they explain this to the California people, that in the midst of the biggest budget crisis we are having a debate about cow tails?"
 This is precisely what is wrong with our polital process today. I have never been so disappointed in our State's leadership as I am today. Hot Air has more to say. Disgusting...
 
I will post more later, got to run the kids off to swim lessons...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »